Trauma Biomechanics - How to Choose Your Project Pathway

This course offers four project pathways, each representing a different way of doing trauma biomechanics.
All pathways are equally valued, equally graded, and equally rigorous - they simply emphasize different skills and interests.

There is no “best” pathway.
The best pathway is the one that matches how you think and how you want to work.


🟦 Pathway A - Numerical / Computational Modeling (FEM)

Choose this pathway if you:

  • Enjoy simulations and computational modeling
  • Are comfortable with FEM software
  • Like exploring “what happens if…” questions
  • Want hands-on experience with injury modeling

What you will do:

  • Build or adapt simplified FE models
  • Apply impact or injury-relevant loading
  • Compute and interpret injury metrics
  • Perform sensitivity or parametric studies

You do NOT need:

  • Very complex geometry
  • Advanced material models
  • High computational resources

Typical outputs:

  • FE models
  • Injury metric plots
  • Interpretation of trends and limitations

Good fit for students interested in:

  • Computational biomechanics
  • Automotive safety
  • Further numerical or PhD research

🟩 Pathway B - Experimental / Proof-of-Concept Design

Choose this pathway if you:

  • Like thinking about how things are tested in the real world
  • Enjoy system design, instrumentation, and feasibility
  • Are interested in building research capability, not just using tools
  • Prefer practical, engineering-oriented thinking

What you will do:

  • Design experimental test setups (rigs, dummies, sleds)
  • Define sensors, protocols, and safety considerations
  • Think about repeatability, validation, and cost
  • Work at the level of how testing could realistically be done

You do NOT need:

  • Access to a real laboratory
  • To build or manufacture anything

Typical outputs:

  • Test system designs
  • Experimental protocols
  • Schematics and feasibility analyses

Good fit for students interested in:

  • Experimental biomechanics
  • Lab development
  • Applied engineering and industry work

🟨 Pathway C - Data-Driven / Analytical Modeling

Choose this pathway if you:

  • Enjoy deep thinking and analysis more than tools
  • Like asking “why does this work?” or “when does this fail?”
  • Prefer literature-based or conceptual work
  • Are interested in research, theory, or PhD studies

What you will do:

  • Analyze injury criteria, models, or mechanisms
  • Develop simplified mechanical or conceptual models
  • Study uncertainty, robustness, or injury evidence
  • Synthesize and critique existing biomechanical knowledge

You do NOT need:

  • FEM software
  • Experimental equipment
  • Advanced programming

Typical outputs:

  • Analytical models
  • Conceptual diagrams
  • Critical synthesis and interpretation

Good fit for students interested in:

  • Research
  • Theory development
  • Critical evaluation of biomechanics

🟥 Pathway D - Prevention, Design & Systems Thinking

Choose this pathway if you:

  • Think at the system or policy level
  • Are interested in safety design, standards, or regulation
  • Like connecting biomechanics to real-world decisions
  • Want to address local or national needs

What you will do:

  • Design safety systems conceptually
  • Analyze standards and injury assessment frameworks
  • Study design trade-offs and feasibility
  • Propose improvements grounded in biomechanics

You do NOT need:

  • FEM
  • Experiments
  • Hardware design

Typical outputs:

  • Evaluation frameworks
  • System-level designs
  • Standards critiques and redesign proposals

Good fit for students interested in:

  • Safety engineering
  • Industry, policy, or regulation
  • Capacity building in developing contexts

⚖️ Important Notes

  • All pathways are graded using rigorous, pathway-specific rubrics
  • No pathway gives an advantage in grading
  • Difficulty is comparable across all pathways
  • You will be graded on:
    • biomechanical reasoning,
    • clarity of thinking,
    • justification of assumptions,
    • awareness of limitations

This course values thinking like a trauma biomechanist, not using a particular tool.


✅ How to Decide

Ask yourself:

  • Do I prefer models, systems, data, or design?
  • Do I want to work with software, concepts, experiments, or frameworks?
  • Which project would I be excited to work on for several weeks?

If unsure, talk to the instructor - guidance is part of the course.


Final Thought

Trauma biomechanics needs modelers, experimentalists, analysts, and system thinkers.

This course allows you to grow in the direction that fits you best.

Seyed Sadjad Abedi-Shahri
Seyed Sadjad Abedi-Shahri
Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering

My research interests include Numerical Methods in Biomechanics, Scientific Computation, and Computational Geometry.